Built for carrier review teams

Review full claim packets with clarity and speed

Santora gives insurance carriers AI-assisted peer review for mitigation and restoration estimates, bringing supporting photos and documents into one workflow so human claim handlers can make faster, better-supported approval decisions.

Claim Packet Review

Claim #WM-2024-4892

Needs Follow-Up

Files Reviewed

4

Potential Savings

$3,420

Key Findings

Equipment sizing exceeds room SF

Dehumidifier count: 4 (expected: 2)

+$1,200

Drying days exceed threshold

5 days (carrier max: 3 days)

+$1,840

Supporting file changes cleaning scope

Scene photos support bio-cleaning containment and PPE review

+$380
Confidence Score
94%

AI-assisted peer review only. Final approval, payment, and coverage decisions stay with your claim team.

Restoration estimate review is a narrow problem with expensive consequences

Santora focuses on mitigation, mold, and restoration estimates where equipment, drying time, documentation, and billing decisions matter before payment.

Mitigation leakage hides in the details

Excess drying days, duplicate charges, unsupported equipment, labor overages, and non-standard line items are easy to miss at claim volume.

Documentation gaps slow decisions

Photos, moisture logs, psychrometric data, drying logs, and monitoring details often decide whether a charge should be paid, questioned, or routed for follow-up.

Scope judgment needs context

A fair review does more than cut. It also spots missing cleaning, PPE, substitutions, vendor math errors, and measurement issues.

Solution

Purpose-built for mitigation estimate peer review

Santora does not try to solve every insurance workflow. It helps claims teams decide what to approve, question, revise, or route for follow-up.

Peer Review Framework

Apply a structured review across intake, technical scope, billing, documentation, and final adjuster recommendation.

Equipment & Measurement Review

Check air movers, dehumidifiers, scrubbers, room dimensions, and vendor math against the loss conditions.

Drying Duration Support

Evaluate billed drying days against moisture readings, monitoring detail, drying logs, and documented conditions.

File-Ready Outputs

Return prioritized findings, support gaps, financial impact, and recommended adjuster next actions.

Process

How Santora works

From uploaded claim packet to a structured AI-assisted peer review your adjusters can approve, edit, or reject.

01

Upload Claim Packet

Submit one or more PDFs, photos, and supporting claim documents together in a single review.

02

Extract Estimate + Support

Capture claim facts, line items, rooms, equipment, labor, and supporting documentation clues across every attachment.

03

Apply Standards and Rulebooks

Evaluate category, drying duration, equipment sizing, demolition, PPE, cleaning, substitutions, and support gaps against industry or carrier rules.

04

Return Next Actions

Receive a file-ready peer review with what to approve, question, request, revise, or send for follow-up before a human makes the final decision.

Output

Adjuster-ready review reports

Each review is organized around prioritized findings, support gaps, financial-impact flags, and the next action an adjuster can take.

Clear Adjuster Action Path

Approve supportable items, request support, revise scope, or route the file for follow-up

Practical Exception Categories

Equipment, drying duration, labor, documentation, measurements, and billing issues

Defensible File Notes

Structured rationale for vendors, supervisors, QA, and internal claim notes

Review Report

Claim #WM-2024-4892

Needs Revision

$3,420

Flagged Amount

7

Issues Found

94%

Confidence

Top Flagged Items

Excessive drying time+$1,840
Equipment oversizing+$1,200
Duplicate demo fee+$380

Review Summary

Drying duration and equipment charges require support from moisture logs and monitoring detail. Request documentation before revision or approval.

Potential savings identified: $3,420
Results

Built around how claim files actually move

The goal is not a generic summary. It is cleaner decisions, stronger file documentation, and repeatable peer review.

01

Prioritized Findings

High-dollar exceptions, unsupported scope, and documentation gaps rise to the top

02

Dollar-Impact Visibility

Reviewers can see where leakage may exist before payment decisions are made

03

Repeatable Logic

Carrier-calibrated review standards help teams handle similar files more consistently

04

Next-Step Guidance

Outputs tell adjusters what to request, revise, approve, or route for follow-up

Who It's For

Built for claims professionals

Santora is built for teams that handle mitigation, mold, and restoration estimate review.

Insurance Carriers

Standardize estimate review across your entire claims operation with consistent, defensible decisions.

Desk Adjusters

Get a cleaner action path for vendor questions, estimate revisions, follow-up handling, or payment decisions.

TPAs & Review Teams

Scale your review capacity without proportionally increasing headcount or training costs.

Vendor Oversight Leaders

Spot recurring exception categories across vendors, claim populations, and review teams.

Explore

Go deeper than the homepage

Use the pages below to dig into the workflows Santora supports and the review topics carrier teams ask about most.

Bring clarity to mitigation estimate review

Talk through your review workflow, vendor oversight needs, and how AI-assisted peer review can support faster human approval without turning claim decisions into a black box.